The Delhi High Court in Dong Yang PC, Inc. v. Controller of Patents & Designs [C.A. (COMM.IPD-PAT) 60/2024], on 1 July 2025, considered an appeal under Section 117A against a Section 15 refusal of 2554/DEL/2013 (“Vertical Rotary Parking System”). A pre-grant opposition filed against the application had cited documents D-1 to D-4, and shortly before the hearing, an additional prior art document, D-5, was introduced. In response, the applicant filed Form-13 seeking to amend the application in reliance on Sections 57-59. The Controller, however, rejected the proposed amendments and refused the application on the ground that the claimed invention lacked inventive step under Section 2(1)(ja), describing the claimed features as no more than a “mere workshop modification.”
Continue reading “Simplicity Is No Bar: Delhi HC on Inventive Step and Amendments”Category: Patents
Delhi High Court upholds refusal under Section 3(k) but sets aside Section 59 objection
The Delhi High Court in Kroll Information Assurance, LLC v. Controller General of Patents, Designs & Trade Marks upheld refusal under Section 3(k) but set aside the Section 59 objection.
In the present case, the Court considered an appeal under Section 117A from a refusal of Indian Patent Application No. 8100/DELNP/2007 (by order dated 25 June 2019) titled “A System, Method and Apparatus to locate at least one type of person, via a peer-to-peer network.” The prosecution history included objections under Section 2(1)(j)/2(1)(ja), Section 10(4)(c), Section 3(b), and Section 3(k), with a hearing-stage objection to amendments under Section 59/Section 57; the Controller ultimately refused under Section 59, Section 2(1)(j), and Section 3(k).
Continue reading “Delhi High Court upholds refusal under Section 3(k) but sets aside Section 59 objection”Celebrating 20 Years of Excellence in IP Protection!
As we mark two decades of dedicated service in intellectual property law, we extend our heartfelt gratitude to our clients, partners, and team members who have been part of this journey.
Continue reading “Celebrating 20 Years of Excellence in IP Protection!”World Intellectual Property Indicators 2024 places India in global top 10 for patents, trademarks and industrial designs
On 12 November 2024, India’s Press Information Bureau reported key outcomes from WIPO’s World Intellectual Property Indicators 2024, confirming India’s position among the global top 10 across patents, trademarks and industrial designs. In patents, India posted the fastest year-on-year growth among the top 20 origins in 2023 (+15.7%), totaling 64,480 applications with a resident share of 55.2%, and a 149.4% year-on-year increase in patent grants. Industrial design applications rose by 36.4%. In trademarks, India ranked fourth globally for filings; the Indian trademark office holds the second-largest number of active registrations worldwide (over 3.2 million), with resident filings accounting for nearly 90%.
Continue reading “World Intellectual Property Indicators 2024 places India in global top 10 for patents, trademarks and industrial designs”Indian Patent Office FAQs: Working Statement Deadlines Explained
The Indian Patent Office has issued Frequently Asked Questions [FAQs] on 26th August 2024, clarifying working statement deadlines under Amendment of Patent Rules of India which came to force on 15th March 2024. For your immediate reference and records, we are enclosing copy of the FAQs.
Continue reading “Indian Patent Office FAQs: Working Statement Deadlines Explained”Madras High Court on Patent Inventiveness, Hindsight and Comparative Data in Genentech Case
Madras High Court via recent judgement dated March 28, 2024, in Genentech vs Controller Of Patents And Designs [(T)CMA(PT) No.57 of 2023 (OA/50/2020/PT/CHN)] addressed Genentech, Inc.’s appeal concerning the rejection of its patent application (No. 5832/CHENP/2014) for “Inhibitors of IAP”—organic compounds intended for cancer therapy.
Continue reading “Madras High Court on Patent Inventiveness, Hindsight and Comparative Data in Genentech Case”Honoring Excellence: A Letter of Appreciation from Kurkshetra University
We are proud to share that our esteemed client, Kurkshetra University, has recently recognized the hard work and dedication of our Managing Founder – Dr. Ramesh Kr. Mehta, with a heartfelt letter of appreciation. His exceptional contributions in developing and building a robust Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) portfolio have been instrumental in shaping the innovative strategies that define our firm.
Continue reading “Honoring Excellence: A Letter of Appreciation from Kurkshetra University”Emphasizing Substantive Evaluation Over Semantics: Madras High Court Sets Aside Patent Rejection
The Madras High Court on February 8, 2024, in Techpolymers Industria E Comercio LTDA vs. The Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs [(T)CMA(PT)/180/2023, (OA/SR.11/2020/PT/CHN)], addressed the rejection of a patent application concerning thermoplastic polymers used in injection-molded articles.
Continue reading “Emphasizing Substantive Evaluation Over Semantics: Madras High Court Sets Aside Patent Rejection”Delhi High Court differentiates between a method of treatment and a method of producing a substance used for treatment
In the matter of Arthrogen GMBH (‘Appellant’) v Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks and Anr (‘Respondents’) [C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 415/2022], the Delhi High Court, vide its order dated 05.02.2024, set aside the Respondents impugned order dated 28th November 2019 and remanded the matter to the Respondents for de novo consideration while restoring the patent application for the subject patent to its original number.
Continue reading “Delhi High Court differentiates between a method of treatment and a method of producing a substance used for treatment”Announcement – Recognition by ‘WIPR Leaders 2021’!
We are pleased to share that members of Mehta & Mehta Associates (MehtaIP) – Ankush Mehta and Abhilasha Niroola have been named in the 2021 edition of WIPR Leaders. Profiling the leading IP practitioners from around the world, WIPR Leaders consists of a directory of entrants. All Leaders were chosen after a four month nomination process, in which WIPR sought views from 12,000 IP professionals.
Continue reading “Announcement – Recognition by ‘WIPR Leaders 2021’!”