Category: section 3(c)

Delhi High Court differentiates between a method of treatment and a method of producing a substance used for treatment

by mehtaip, posted in Abhilasha Niroola, Ankush Mehta, Mehta & Mehta, Mehta & Mehta Associates, MehtaIP, Patentability, Patents, section 3(b), section 3(c), section 3(d), section 3(e), section 3(f), section 3(i)

In the matter of Arthrogen GMBH (‘Appellant’) v Controller General of Patents, Designs and Trademarks and Anr (‘Respondents’) [C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 415/2022], the Delhi High Court, vide its order dated 05.02.2024, set aside the Respondents impugned order dated 28th November 2019 and remanded the matter to the Respondents for de novo consideration while restoring the patent application for the subject patent to its original number.

Continue reading “Delhi High Court differentiates between a method of treatment and a method of producing a substance used for treatment” →