The Delhi High Court in Dong Yang PC, Inc. v. Controller of Patents & Designs [C.A. (COMM.IPD-PAT) 60/2024], on 1 July 2025, considered an appeal under Section 117A against a Section 15 refusal of 2554/DEL/2013 (“Vertical Rotary Parking System”). A pre-grant opposition filed against the application had cited documents D-1 to D-4, and shortly before the hearing, an additional prior art document, D-5, was introduced. In response, the applicant filed Form-13 seeking to amend the application in reliance on Sections 57-59. The Controller, however, rejected the proposed amendments and refused the application on the ground that the claimed invention lacked inventive step under Section 2(1)(ja), describing the claimed features as no more than a “mere workshop modification.”
Continue reading “Simplicity Is No Bar: Delhi HC on Inventive Step and Amendments”Tag: patent
Indian Patent Office FAQs: Working Statement Deadlines Explained
The Indian Patent Office has issued Frequently Asked Questions [FAQs] on 26th August 2024, clarifying working statement deadlines under Amendment of Patent Rules of India which came to force on 15th March 2024. For your immediate reference and records, we are enclosing copy of the FAQs.
Continue reading “Indian Patent Office FAQs: Working Statement Deadlines Explained”Madras High Court on Patent Inventiveness, Hindsight and Comparative Data in Genentech Case
Madras High Court via recent judgement dated March 28, 2024, in Genentech vs Controller Of Patents And Designs [(T)CMA(PT) No.57 of 2023 (OA/50/2020/PT/CHN)] addressed Genentech, Inc.’s appeal concerning the rejection of its patent application (No. 5832/CHENP/2014) for “Inhibitors of IAP”—organic compounds intended for cancer therapy.
Continue reading “Madras High Court on Patent Inventiveness, Hindsight and Comparative Data in Genentech Case”