Dettol Halts Sale of Infringing COVID-19 Product

A recent case in the Delhi High Court provided another good example of how the COVID-19 pandemic is creating new challenges for brand owners, highlighting the importance of safeguarding brands against infringement.

The court, through its order dated May 28, 2020, in Reckitt Benckiser (India) Pvt. Ltd. (plaintiff) v. Mohit Petrochemicals Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. (defendants) [CS (COMM) No.141/2020] permanently restrained the defendants from using the infringing DEVTOL mark and logo.

Plaintiff’s Mark – Dettol Defendant’s Offering Mark – Devtol
Dettol Mark Devtol Mark
Dettol Mark Devtol Mark

The plaintiff, a manufacturer of a well-known antiseptic sold under the DETTOL registered trademark and logo (Indian Registration Nos. 1576501 and 141707), approached the Delhi High Court on finding that the defendants were selling hand sanitizers under the DEVTOL brand, which claimed to give protection from COVID-19.

Along with various other reliefs sought against the alleged infringing DEVTOL mark and logo, the plaintiff also sought direction to permanently restrain the defendants from using its trademark.

The defendants submitted that they had already taken steps to withdraw their application for the infringing DEVTOL mark, and that they would not manufacture or sell the product, that is, the hand sanitizer, under the infringing mark. Further, they stated that they had already written to their agents and dealers to withdraw the product bearing the infringing mark from the market.

The court, …

Continue to read over here –


Contributor to present post is Abhilasha.


“This article was written by Abhilasha for first publication in the INTA Bulletin. It has been reprinted with permission from the International Trademark Association (INTA).”


Views / opinions expressed in present update are solely that of the contributor(s) and are for explanatory / update / informational purposes only and which cannot be quoted in any legal proceedings and will have no legal purpose. Further, same may vary from time to time and case to case. It is neither intended to advertise nor solicit the Firm in any way whatsoever, nor is it purported to create an attorney-client privilege communication. For any clarification and further information, you may contact us at